Very high-energy electron therapy as light-particle alternative to transmission proton FLASH therapy - An evaluation of dosimetric performances.

PURPOSE: Clinical translation of FLASH-radiotherapy (RT) to deep-seated tumours is still a technological challenge. One proposed solution consists of using ultra-high dose rate transmission proton (TP) beams of about 200-250 MeV to irradiate the tumour with the flat entrance of the proton depth-dose profile. This work evaluates the dosimetric performance of very high-energy electron (VHEE)-based RT (50-250 MeV) as a potential alternative to TP-based RT for the clinical transfer of the FLASH effect. METHODS: Basic physics characteristics of VHEE and TP beams were compared utilizing Monte Carlo simulations in water. A VHEE-enabled research treatment planning system was used to evaluate the plan quality achievable with VHEE beams of different energies, compared to 250 MeV TP beams for a glioblastoma, an oesophagus, and a prostate cancer case. RESULTS: Like TP, VHEE above 100 MeV can treat targets with roughly flat (within ± 20 %) depth-dose distributions. The achievable dosimetric target conformity and adjacent organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing is consequently driven for both modalities by their lateral beam penumbrae. Electron beams of 400[500] MeV match the penumbra of 200[250] MeV TP beams and penumbra is increased for lower electron energies. For the investigated patient cases, VHEE plans with energies of 150 MeV and above achieved a dosimetric plan quality comparable to that of 250 MeV TP plans. For the glioblastoma and the oesophagus case, although having a decreased conformity, even 100 MeV VHEE plans provided a similar target coverage and OAR sparing compared to TP. CONCLUSIONS: VHEE-based FLASH-RT using sufficiently high beam energies may provide a lighter-particle alternative to TP-based FLASH-RT with comparable dosimetric plan quality.

3D-conformal very-high energy electron therapy as candidate modality for FLASH-RT: A treatment planning study for glioblastoma and lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pre-clinical ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron irradiations on time scales of 100 ms have demonstrated a remarkable sparing of brain and lung tissues while retaining tumor efficacy when compared to conventional dose rate irradiations. While clinically-used gantries and intensity modulation techniques are too slow to match such time scales, novel very-high energy electron (VHEE, 50-250 MeV) radiotherapy (RT) devices using 3D-conformed broad VHEE beams are designed to deliver UHDR treatments that fulfill these timing requirements. PURPOSE: To assess the dosimetric plan quality obtained using VHEE-based 3D-conformal RT (3D-CRT) for treatments of glioblastoma and lung cancer patients and compare the resulting treatment plans to those delivered by standard-of-care intensity modulated photon RT (IMRT) techniques. METHODS: Seven glioblastoma patients and seven lung cancer patients were planned with VHEE-based 3D-CRT using 3 to 16 coplanar beams with equidistant angular spacing and energies of 100 and 200 MeV using a forward planning approach. Dose distributions, dose-volume histograms, coverage (V95% ) and homogeneity (HI98% ) for the planning target volume (PTV), as well as near-maximum doses (D2% ) and mean doses (Dmean ) for organs-at-risk (OAR) were evaluated and compared to clinical IMRT plans. RESULTS: Mean differences of V95% and HI98% of all VHEE plans were within 2% or better of the IMRT reference plans. Glioblastoma plan dose metrics obtained with VHEE configurations of 200 MeV and 3-16 beams were either not significantly different or were significantly improved compared to the clinical IMRT reference plans. All OAR plan dose metrics evaluated for VHEE plans created using 5 beams of 100 MeV were either not significantly different or within 3% on average, except for Dmean for the body, Dmean for the brain, D2% for the brain stem, and D2% for the chiasm, which were significantly increased by 1, 2, 6, and 8 Gy, respectively (however below clinical constraints). Similarly, the dose metrics for lung cancer patients were also either not significantly different or were significantly improved compared to the reference plans for VHEE configurations with 200 MeV and 5 to 16 beams with the exception of D2% and Dmean to the spinal canal (however below clinical constraints). For the lung cancer cases, the VHEE configurations using 100 MeV or only 3 beams resulted in significantly worse dose metrics for some OAR. Differences in dose metrics were, however, strongly patient-specific and similar for some patient cases. CONCLUSIONS: VHEE-based 3D-CRT may deliver conformal treatments to simple, mostly convex target shapes in the brain and the thorax with a limited number of critical adjacent OAR using a limited number of beams (as low as 3 to 7). Using such treatment techniques, a dosimetric plan quality comparable to that of standard-of-care IMRT can be achieved. Hence, from a treatment planning perspective, 3D-conformal UHDR VHEE treatments delivered on time scales of 100 ms represent a promising candidate technique for the clinical transfer of the FLASH effect.

The general-purpose Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit and its Geant4-DNA extension to investigate mechanisms underlying the FLASH effect in radiotherapy: Current status and challenges.

FLASH radiotherapy is a promising approach to cancer treatment that offers several advantages over conventional radiotherapy. With this novel technique, high doses of radiation are delivered in a short period of time, inducing the so-called FLASH effect - a phenomenon characterized by healthy tissue sparing without alteration of tumor control. The mechanisms behind the FLASH effect remain unknown. One way to approach this problem is to gain insight into the initial parameters that can distinguish FLASH from conventional irradiation by simulating particle transport in aqueous media using the general-purpose Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit and its Geant4-DNA extension. This review article discusses the current status of Geant4 and Geant4-DNA simulations to investigate mechanisms underlying the FLASH effect, as well as the challenges faced in this research field. One of the primary challenges is to accurately simulate the experimental irradiation parameters. Another challenge is the temporal extension of the simulations. This review also focuses on two hypotheses to explain the FLASH effect - namely the oxygen depletion hypothesis and the inter-track interactions hypothesis - and discusses how the Geant4 toolkit can be used to investigate them. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of Geant4 and Geant4-DNA simulations for FLASH radiotherapy and to highlight the challenges that need to be overcome in order to better study the FLASH effect.

Dosimetry in the lungs of α-particles (210Po) and ß-particles (210Pb) present in the tobacco smoke of conventional cigarettes and heated tobacco products.

Tobacco products contain radioactive 210Pb and 210Po which can be transferred from the filler to the mainstream smoke. When inhaled, they can contribute to the radioactive dose to the lungs and are suspected to significantly contribute to lung cancer from smoking. Currently, no data are available on the radioactive risk of the heated tobacco products (HTP). However, due to the relatively high heat involved in some of these devices, there are concerns about the volatility of polonium particles. Here we used data on the 210Po and 210Pb content in tobacco smoke along with biokinetic and dosimetric models to compute the effective dose induced by conventional smoking and by using an HTP device (PMI IQOS system). Results show that conventional smoking of one pack per day induces a dose to the lung of about 0.3 mSv/year. This dose decreases by a factor of ten (0.03 mSv/year) for the IQOS system. However, this dose reduction is not obtained by specific countermeasures but by the fact that the IQOS system heats only 15% of the tobacco filler to the target temperature of 330 °C. When heated homogeneously to 300 °C, both conventional and Heets (IQOS) cigarettes release about 80% of the 210Po from the tobacco, leading to similar doses to lungs.

Geant4-DNA Modeling of Water Radiolysis beyond the Microsecond: An On-Lattice Stochastic Approach.

In this work, we use the next sub-volume method (NSM) to investigate the possibility of using the compartment-based ("on-lattice") model to simulate water radiolysis. We, first, start with a brief description of the reaction-diffusion master equation (RDME) in a spatially discretized simulation volume ("mesh"), which is divided into sub-volumes (or "voxels"). We then discuss the choice of voxel size and merging technique of a given mesh, along with the evolution of the system using the hierarchical algorithm for the RDME ("hRDME"). Since the compartment-based model cannot describe high concentration species of early radiation-induced spurs, we propose a combination of the particle-based step-by-step ("SBS") Brownian dynamics model and the compartment-based model ("SBS-RDME model") for the simulation. We, finally, use the particle-based SBS Brownian dynamics model of Geant4-DNA as a reference to test the model implementation through several benchmarks. We find that the compartment-based model can efficiently simulate the system with a large number of species and for longer timescales, beyond the microsecond, with a reasonable computing time. Our aim in developing this model is to study the production and evolution of reactive oxygen species generated under irradiation with different dose rate conditions, such as in FLASH and conventional radiotherapy.

A benchmarking study of Geant4 for Auger electrons emitted by medical radioisotopes.

Auger emitting radioisotopes are of great interest in targeted radiotherapy because, once internalised in the tumour cells, they can deliver dose locally to the radiation sensitive targets, while not affecting surrounding cells. Geant4 is a Monte Carlo code widely used to characterise the physics mechanism at the basis of targeted radiotherapy. In this work, we benchmarked the modelling of the emission of Auger electrons in Geant4 deriving from the decay of 123I, 124I, 125I radionuclides against existing theoretical approaches. We also compared Geant4 against reference data in the case of 131Cs, which is of interest for brachytherapy. In the case of 125I and 131Cs, the simulation results are compared to experimental measurements as well. Good agreement was found between Geant4 and the reference data. As far as we know, this is the first study aimed to benchmark against experimental measurements the emission of Auger electrons in Geant4 for radiotherapy applications.

Efficiency of the RADPAD Surgical Cap in Reducing Brain Exposure During Pacemaker and Defibrillator Implantation.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the RADPAD No Brainer (Worldwide Innovation and Technologies, Overland Park, Kansas) efficiency in reducing brain exposure to scattered radiation. BACKGROUND: Cranial radioprotective caps such as the RADPAD No Brainer are being marketed as devices that significantly reduce operator's brain exposure to scattered radiation. However, the efficiency of the RADPAD No Brainer in reducing brain exposure in clinical practice remains unknown to date. METHODS: Five electrophysiologists performing device implantations over a 2-month period wore the RADPAD cap with 2 strips of 11 thermoluminescent dosimeter pellets covering the front head above and under the shielded cap. Phantom measurements and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to further investigate brain dose distribution. RESULTS: Our study showed that the right half of the operators' front head was the most exposed region during left subpectoral device implantation; the RADPAD cap attenuated the skin front-head exposure but provided no protection to the brain. The exposure of the anterior part of the brain was decreased by a factor of 4.5 compared with the front-head skin value thanks to the skull. The RADPAD cap worn as a protruding horizontal plane, however, reduced brain exposure by a factor of 1.7 (interquartile range: 1.3 to 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: During device implantation, the RADPAD No Brainer decreased the skin front head exposure but had no impact on brain dose distribution. The RADPAD No Brainer worn as a horizontal plane worn around the neck reduces brain exposure and confirms that the exposure comes from upward scattered radiation.

Activity standardisation of 161Tb.

161Tb, which emits low-energy ß-- and γ-particles in addition to conversion and Auger electrons, has aroused increased interest for medical imaging and therapy. To support the use of this radionuclide, a161Tb solution was standardised using the ß-γ coincidence technique, as well as the TDCR method. The solution had 4.5·10-3% of 160Tb impurities. Primary coincidence measurements, with plastic or liquid scintillators for beta detection, were carried out using both analogue and digital electronics. TDCR measurements using defocusing, grey filtering and quenching for varying the efficiency were also made. Monte Carlo calculations were used to compute the detection efficiency. The coincidence measurements with analogue electronics and the TDCR show a good consistency, and are compatible with the digital coincidence results within uncertainties. An ampoule of this solution was submitted to the BIPM as a contribution to the international reference system.

Dosimetric and preparation procedures for irradiating biological models with pulsed electron beam at ultra-high dose-rate.

PURPOSE: Preclinical studies using a new treatment modality called FLASH Radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) need a two-phase procedure to ensure minimal uncertainties in the delivered dose. The first phase requires a new investigation of the reference dosimetry lying outside the conventional metrology framework from national metrology institutes but necessary to obtain traceability, repeatability, and stability of irradiations. The second consists of performing special quality assurance procedure prior to irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Oriatron eRT6 (PMB-Alcen, France) is an experimental high dose-per-pulse linear accelerator, delivering a 6 MeV pulsed electron beam with mean dose-rates, ranging from a few Gy/min up to thousands of Gy/s. Absolute dosimetry is investigated with alanine, thermo-luminescent dosimeters (TLD) and radiochromic films as well as an ionization chamber for relative stability. The beam characteristic and dosimetry are prepared for three different setups. RESULTS: A cross-check between alanine, films and TLD revealed a dose agreement within 3% for dose-rates between 0.078 Gy/s and 1050 Gy/s, showing that these dosimeters are suitable for absolute dosimetry for FLASH-RT. In absence of appropriate setup dependent corrections, active dosimetry can reveal dose deviations up to 15% of the prescribed dose. These differences reduce to less than 3% when our dosimetric procedure is applied. CONCLUSION: We developed procedures to accurately irradiate biological models. Our method is based on validated absolute dosimeters and extends their use to routine FLASH irradiations. We reached an agreement of 3% between the delivered and prescribed dose and developed the requirements needed for workflows of preclinical and clinical studies.